Problem Challenge: News Reporting in the Future?
If we have to face a future without newspapers, can you imagine how we might find innovative ways to maintain access to the authoritative reporting by respected journalists at every level of society?
Will Richardson posted about his reactions to a future without newspapers, Mourning Old Media, Mourning Old Media Teachers.
I had heard through NPR of the change at the Christian Science Monitor but hadn’t heard about the changes in the other newspapers. The New York Times article, Mourning Old Media’s Decline, David Carr, is a real wake up call to everyone who grew up in a world where we took newspapers for granted.
Clearly, the sky is falling. The question now is how many people will be left to cover it. ~ David Carr
The paradox of all these announcements is that newspapers and magazines do not have an audience problem — newspaper Web sites are a vital source of news, and growing — but they do have a consumer problem. ~ David Carr
October 2008
1 – number of movie reviewers left on staff of The Los Angeles Times
1 – number of dollars TV Guide was sold for
2 – number of days the Christian Science Monitor will publish each week in the future
5 – number of days the Christian Science Monitor will not publish each week in the future
40 – percent of people The Star-Ledger of Newark, the 15th-largest paper in the country, will cut from it’s editorial staff
50 – percent of people The Los Angeles Times has left in the newsroom after 7 years of reductions
90 – percent of revenue the newspaper industry still derives from the print product
600 – number of people Time Inc., the Olympian home of Time magazine, Fortune, People and Sports Illustrated, announced that it was cutting
3,000 – number of people Gannett, the largest newspaper publisher in the country, plans to lay off 10 percent of its work force
~ Information from Mourning Old Media’s Decline, David Carr
October 29th, 2008 at 5:36 pm
[...] Simply drag and drop the widgets you want to the sidebars you want them in ← Problem Challenge: News Reporting in the Future? [...]
October 30th, 2008 at 7:05 am
I don’t remember the last time I read a newspaper… and I would argue that many newspaper articles are not written to inform but rather to exaggerate, or oversimplify, or sensationalize a topic for the sake of grabbing your attention… and then they don’t go deep enough to make the read worthwhile.
I’ve questioned the validity, importance and integrity of papers ever since I watched Manufacturing Consent by Noam Chomsky years ago: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5631882395226827730
(Slow, but very worth watching)
Newspapers’ attempts to sensationalize & create an urgency to read things are what have caused their own demise. So too has their focus on narrow issues that all papers cover… the simple fact is that television and multi-media do that better than papers do.
If papers stopped making what Perez Hilton talks about the focus of their ‘news’ then they will find a market and survive. If I felt I could open a paper and read more than just one good article, that I needed to browse 15 articles to find, then maybe I’d pick one up every now and then, or even subscribe!